[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: determining the stack bounds
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: determining the stack bounds |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Jun 2008 01:13:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> On Solaris 8, uc_stack is (IMHO properly) pointing to the primary stack,
> even though the handler is executing on the alternate stack.
That's accidental, IMO.
The only documented use of uc_stack in POSIX:2001 is in the description of
'makecontext', as an input parameter. Its meaning is not documented in the
use of 'getcontext' or when a signal handler is invoked. Therefore, if the
next version of POSIX does not have 'makecontext', IMO they should also
remove the uc_stack member.
Also, you know that the main context has a growing stack; it's managed by
the kernel as something dynamic (taking into account the RLIMITs that will
be in effect), not as something static. Such a dynamic piece of stack cannot
be adequately represented by a stack_t. Solaris escapes the problem by
returning to you a snapshot of the stack VMA bounds; Linux escapes the
problem by returning the alternate stack bounds (which _is_ a stack_t).
> Again, anyone know how to report something like that?
First, gather enough arguments that it is really a bug in Linux (which I
dispute). Then, write a kernel patch that fixes the bug, relative to the newest
development kernels. Third, submit it to LKML, and be prepared to either a
heated discussion or complete silence :-)
Bruno
- Re: c-stack vs. older platforms, (continued)
- Re: c-stack vs. older platforms, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/05
- Re: c-stack vs. older platforms, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/05
- Re: c-stack vs. older platforms, Eric Blake, 2008/06/05
- Re: c-stack vs. older platforms, Eric Blake, 2008/06/05
- Re: determining the stack bounds, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/05
- Re: determining the stack bounds, Eric Blake, 2008/06/05
- Re: determining the stack bounds, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/06
- Re: determining the stack bounds, Eric Blake, 2008/06/06
- Re: determining the stack bounds, Eric Blake, 2008/06/06
- Re: determining the stack bounds, Eric Blake, 2008/06/06
- Re: determining the stack bounds,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: c-stack vs. older platforms, Eric Blake, 2008/06/06