[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: memmem issues
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
Re: memmem issues |
|
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:22:19 +0100 |
"Bruno Haible" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> section 6.2.6.1:
>> ...
>> Here again, the intent is that memcmp(&x, &y, sizeof (T)) compares all
>> the bits in the underlying representation. The only way to do that
>> portably is via "unsigned char *".
>
> OK. Here's a proposed patch for the memmem function.
Your patch didn't reach the list.