[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
m4 and progname (was: Re: mingw and memcmp)
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
m4 and progname (was: Re: mingw and memcmp) |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:21:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> (I'm starting to wonder if it is easier to require all test-foo.c programs to
> declare and populate program_name themselves, rather than relying on the
> progname module.)
Oh no. The progname module is there to simplify things for both programs and
test suite.
It would be better the other way around: Let m4 use the 'progname' module.
If you feel that it contains too much code (like the libtool workaround),
make this code conditional. In [1] you mentioned a way to detect whether
libtool is used; you can use that to enable the libtool-specific code
in progname only when libtool is used.
Bruno
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2007-12/msg00025.html
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- m4 and progname (was: Re: mingw and memcmp),
Bruno Haible <=