[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPLv2.5
From: |
Brett Smith |
Subject: |
Re: LGPLv2.5 |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:29:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:57:02AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> If LGPLv2.5 comes to exist, it may replace some of our uses of LGPLv2+.
>
> We are moving to LGPLv3+ only those parts of gnulib where we consider
> that GPLv2 compatibility is not desired; in these cases LGPLv2.5 has no
> advantage over LGPLv3+.
This sounds like exactly the right course of action to me; please go ahead
with that.
To answer the original (and completely separate :) ) question: we got a
wider variety of feedback on the LGPLv2.5 proposal than we anticipated, so
there's still a lot of discussion going on about how best to proceed. I
imagine we'll do something to address the compatibility issue one way or
another, but right now I can't really say much about what that would be or
when it might happen.
Best regards,
--
Brett Smith
Licensing Compliance Engineer, Free Software Foundation
- LGPLv2.5, Karl Berry, 2007/10/01
- Re: LGPLv2.5, Bruno Haible, 2007/10/01
- Re: LGPLv2.5,
Brett Smith <=