Re: gplv3 files and updates

[Eric Blake]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Karl Berry on 6/30/2007 12:02 PM:
>     Since modification of these files is not allowed by the consumer, 
> 
> It's always been allowed to "reformat" the licenses.  What's not allowed
> is to change the words.

So, just like had to be done with gpl.texi back when it was version 2, it
is necessary to s/unnumbered/appendixsec/ if including the GPLv3 in an
appendix of the manual?  It would be nicer if gpl-3.0.texi behaved like
fdl.texi, already prepared for inclusion in an appendix (or if texinfo
could support some other subsectioning keyword that works regardless of
whether the parent is a main body section or an appendix).

Also, gpl-2.0.texi adds a @cindex entry, but gpl-3.0.texi lacks it.  That
means the manual's index is one entry shorter by upgrading to the new
license; I'm wondering if that was intentional.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGjF4584KuGfSFAYARAlccAJ41DqlrXrEoaYGOMGIttVc/DckfHwCgvSkp
ZREf9PzJ6Dq2NkSzv8KSzv0=
=wVw9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----