Re: include_next missing

[Jim Meyering]

"Sergey Poznyakoff" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Jim Meyering <address@hidden> ha escrit:
>
>> It seems more likely that there should be a new file named
>> modules/include_next.  If you create it as follows, at least
>> coreutils builds once again:
>
> Yes, that's what I did to bootstrap tar and cpio. Nevertheless, the
> following lines in ChangeLog:
>
>         * modules/fcntl (Depends-on): Depend on absolute-header, not
>         include_next.
>         * modules/float: Likewise.
>         * modules/inttypes: Likewise.
>       ...
>
> make me doubt whether this was the right solution.

That ChangeLog entry should be reversed.
It can only make sense this way:

        * modules/fcntl (Depends-on): Depend on include_next, not
        absolute-header include_next.

since there has never been an include_next module, and until
that change, fcntl *did* depend on absolute-header.