[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: operations on FILE streams
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: operations on FILE streams |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:07:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> For what it's worth, Solaris and glibc both document these functions.
And they implement them differently [1]. As was to be expected for functions
for which no standardization organization has considered an unambiguous
specification.
Bruno
[1] http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4359
- Re: 'fflush' test failure on Cygwin, (continued)
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Paul Eggert, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Eric Blake-1, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams, Paul Eggert, 2007/04/13
- Re: operations on FILE streams,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: 'fflush' test failure on Cygwin, Eric Blake, 2007/04/16
- Re: 'fflush' test failure on Cygwin, Bruno Haible, 2007/04/23
- Re: 'fflush' test failure on Cygwin, Eric Blake, 2007/04/23
- new module 'fseeko', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/25
- Re: new module 'fseeko', Eric Blake, 2007/04/25
- Re: new module 'fseeko', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/26
- Re: new module 'fseeko', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/28
- Re: new module 'fseeko', Paul Eggert, 2007/04/25
- Re: new module 'fseeko', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/26
- new module 'ftello', Bruno Haible, 2007/04/25