[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf - call for volunteers
From: |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
Subject: |
Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf - call for volunteers |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:09:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:09:01AM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Using snprintfv seems better for you - there you can redefine each directive's
> execution independently.
Yes - that's exactly my plan :-)
> > Anyway, I'm stalled for a while on snprintfv
>
> Why? Paolo presented a nice plan [1]. It only needs to be executed.
Sorry, "stalled" may not have been the right word. I am totally in
support of Paolo's plan, and I began executing it, but a big project
has come up at work - so I'm out of time, for the next couple of
weeks. I hope that if no one else does sooner, I'll be back to it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf - call for volunteers, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/03/05
Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf - call for volunteers, Albert Chin, 2007/03/07