Re: new module no-c++

[Bruno Haible]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> for it to be useful won't we
> also need to sprinkle $(NO_CXX) throughout the descriptions of all
> modules that are not compilable with g++?

Yes. This is easy to do. I imagine Simon's buildbot will give us the list
of modules for which it is necessary.

So far, I put each such module into a libtool convenience library manually.
see for example [1]. But obviously it would be better if gnulib-tool could
collect these modules into a convenience library automatically.

Bruno

[1] 
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gettext/gnulib-local/modules/libcroco?rev=1.2&root=gettext&view=auto