[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: version control system
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: version control system |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:47:39 +0100 |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
...
>> > - automatic daily backup,
>>
>> Not relevant.
>> With git or hg, anyone who pulls gets the entire repository.
>
> Hmm, but if the central repository got lost, and was restored through - say -
> my copy, everyone would see my temporary branches,
No problem.
Just make a copy (clone your repo) and remove your temporary
branches in the copy before publishing it.
> and see the patches in the
> order in which I pulled them and merged them with my patches, which is not
> the original order. No?
No. Deltas in a git repository can't get "out of order".
- Re: coreutils-6.5 released (stable), (continued)
- Re: coreutils-6.5 released (stable), Jim Meyering, 2006/11/21
- Re: coreutils-6.5 released (stable), Eric Blake, 2006/11/21
- Re: coreutils-6.5 released (stable), Jim Meyering, 2006/11/21
- Re: coreutils-6.5 released (stable), Simon Josefsson, 2006/11/21
- switching gnulib from CVS to a dVCS, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/21
- Re: switching gnulib from CVS to a dVCS, Eric Blake, 2006/11/27
- Re: [bug-gnulib] version control system, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/21
- Re: version control system, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Re: version control system, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Re: version control system, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/22
- Re: version control system,
Jim Meyering <=
- Message not available
- Re: git for Darwin?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Re: git for Darwin?, Karl Berry, 2006/11/22
- Re: git for Darwin?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Re: git for Darwin?, Karl Berry, 2006/11/22
- Re: git for Darwin?, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/22
- Re: [bug-gnulib] git for Darwin?, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/22
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-gnulib] git for Darwin?, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/22
Re: gettext.m4 bug (was: coreutils-6.5 released (stable)), Bruno Haible, 2006/11/21