[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Updating FreeBSD port
From: |
Mikhail Teterin |
Subject: |
Re: Updating FreeBSD port |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:43:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Thursday 21 September 2006 08:33, Eric Blake wrote:
= > getopt(c, v, "r::");
=
= ...even though the "::" in this line is what makes this test program leave
= the realm of POSIX-specified behavior (and why GNU and BSD differ on
= opinion on what should happen).
It would seem to me, that it is gm4, that should change to rely on
Posix-specified behavior of standard functions (like getopt) instead of
expecting the platform's getopt to be "extended" or building its own
replacement for the standard function(s).
There was a point in (recent) history, when the concept of "Embrace and
Extend" was rather frowned upon...
-mi
Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/20
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Updating FreeBSD port, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port,
Mikhail Teterin <=
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Mikhail Teterin, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/21
- non-POSIX getopt() (Re: Updating FreeBSD port), Mikhail Teterin, 2006/09/21
- Re: non-POSIX getopt() (Re: Updating FreeBSD port), Eric Blake-1, 2006/09/21
- Re: non-POSIX getopt() (Re: Updating FreeBSD port), Paul Eggert, 2006/09/21
Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Mikhail Teterin, 2006/09/21
Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/21
Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Mikhail Teterin, 2006/09/21
Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake-1, 2006/09/21