[Bug-gnulib] Re: missing licenses in gnulib

[Robert Millan]

This message was lost due to MTA problems, so I'm forwarding it.

On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 03:37:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 03:22:01PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > On 2004-09-22 14:58:24 +0100 Robert Millan <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > >[ putting debian-legal on CC ]
> > 
> > For what end?
> 
> Because gnulib is ITPed (#272867), we need to sort out possible legal problems
> before adding it to Debian, and debian-legal may offer advice.
> 
> > To me, this looks like you are trolling a list @gnu.org - please be 
> > more precise with your wording on this topic. My current understanding 
> > is that the FSF does not consider "is this documentation also free 
> > software?" to be a sensible question, while many debian developers do. 
> > I agree with the conclusion that it's better to omit them from 
> > discussion for now.
> 
> Both of us are aware of the issue so it's useless to argue about it.  I didn't
> intend to spawn a discussion on this, but in my report I was listing all the
> license problems I found in gnulib and I won't hide this from the list as if
> it didn't exist.  I think I was clear enough.
> 
> -- 
>  .''`.   Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S)
> : :' :
> `. `'    http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu
>   `-
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to address@hidden
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact address@hidden
> 

-- 
 .''`.   Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S)
: :' :
`. `'    http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu
  `-