[Bug-gnulib] Re: mktime.c fix

[Jeff Bailey]

On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 03:50, Paul Eggert wrote:

> > Thanks for the fix for mktime.c[0] - Is this a file that will eventually
> > be synchronized into glibc as part of the usual gnulib administrivia?

> That's the intent, but it's been several months now and I haven't
> gotten around to it.  Is that something that you can do easily?
> Every change in gnulib mktime.c should be migrated to glibc.

> If this is not easy for you to do (e.g., you don't have glibc checkin
> privileges), then please don't bother; I'll get to it eventually.

I don't have glibc check-in - I can post the patch to libc-hacker,
though.

It's been a while since I've looked at this, but it appears that the
files should be identical, right?  (All the #ifdef _LIBC constructs are
still in place).  If yes, I can put together a series of patches to get
it back in sync.

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

-- 
In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn't been
misused by the very people entrusted with keeping its information safe.
 - Bruce Schneier

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part