[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 19:04:52 +0200 |
Derek Robert Price <address@hidden> wrote:
> What about the pre-ANSI C function declarations in memmove.c and maybe
> elsewhere:
>
> void *
> memmove (dest, source, length)
> char *dest;
> const char *source;
> unsigned length;
> {
>
> Is that just lack of motivation to update them or is there a reason
> for leaving them that way?
It's that way only because glibc is still that way and
we use the same code. With a little luck, warts like
this won't remain in glibc for too much longer.
- [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, Derek Robert Price, 2003/07/21
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, Derek Robert Price, 2003/07/22
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, Paul Eggert, 2003/07/22
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, Derek Robert Price, 2003/07/22
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, Paul Eggert, 2003/07/22
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, Derek Robert Price, 2003/07/23
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, Bruno Haible, 2003/07/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, James Youngman, 2003/07/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, Bruno Haible, 2003/07/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, Derek Robert Price, 2003/07/24
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] 03-getndelim2-c89.diff, Tyler Berry, 2003/07/24