bug-gnucobol
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
From
:
Simon Sobisch
Subject
:
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
Date
:
Mon, 14 May 2018 18:49:46 +0200
User-agent
:
K-9 Mail for Android
I haven't checked IBMs docs on this but I assume the correct thing to do for std ibm and bs2000 would be to implement COMP-5 as different comp type. What does MicroFocus do in ibm mode?
Simon
reply via email to
[
Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
[Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
,
Bruce Zupek
,
2018/05/13
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
,
Sergey Kashyrin
,
2018/05/14
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
,
Simon Sobisch
<=
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
,
Ron Norman
,
2018/05/14
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
,
Bruce Zupek
,
2018/05/14
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
,
Ron Norman
,
2018/05/14
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
,
Bruce Zupek
,
2018/05/14
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
,
Sergey Kashyrin
,
2018/05/14
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
,
Bruce Zupek
,
2018/05/14
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
,
Ron Norman
,
2018/05/15
Prev by Date:
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
Next by Date:
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
Previous by thread:
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
Next by thread:
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] Binary allocations - -fbinary-size=2-4-8
Index(es):
Date
Thread