bug-gnucobol
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-rc1] testsuite: 18 19 20 failed


From: Artie Arnoldt
Subject: Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-rc1] testsuite: 18 19 20 failed
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 07:33:56 -0700

I think I found out what caused it.
I used my MinGW folder to build in but forgot to remove the previous build from MinGW\sys
I did another build after deleting the old stuff  and everything worked OK.

Thanks

Artie

-----Original Message----- From: Simon Sobisch
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2018 4:15 AM
To: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-rc1] testsuite: 18 19 20 failed

Am 23.04.2018 um 23:17 schrieb Artie Arnoldt:
I am testing out the new GnuCobol 3.0-rc1 release [...] running Window 10 32-bit.
I used my MinGW setup that I build OC R2.2 with.

Arnold Trembley has a similar environment and if I remember correctly
there were no unexpected failures.

Attached are make screen log and make check screen log as well as the
test suite log plus other files that were updated in tests folder.

Thank you. In 99,5% testsuite.log is the relevant file (was in your
case, too; it always includes atconfig and atlocal).

It shows an interesting reason for all the failed tests:

libcob: entry point 'prog' not found

This means libcob (internally started with cobcrun after compilation was
fine) found a prog.dll but this doesn't contain a "prog" entry point.

Can you please recheck that there is no prog.dll in the entries that are
included in the PATH entry in your MSYS environment? I *assume* you find
one. Please report back and we dig in further if needed or can think
about checking this beforehand - or rename the module and PROGRAM-ID
(which results in an entry point generation) for these three tests.

I also ran make test here is the bottom of the screen log

[...]
Comparing total test results
diff ./summary.txt summary.log

make[3]: Leaving directory `/mingw/MSYS/gnucobol-3.0-rc1/tests/cobol85'

If you see this - which means there are no differences to the expected
result - then the tested NIST entries are all fine.
Artie Arnoldt





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]