|
From: | Philippe Michel |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnubg] Some questions about build options and toolchain |
Date: | Sun, 18 Jan 2015 15:11:59 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: | Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) |
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Russ Allbery wrote:
Philippe Michel <address@hidden> writes:
Finally, would it cause trouble to someone if gnubg was build as C99 code (-std=gnu99 really, since it would have to cater with embedded asm).Would be fine here, although I'm surprised it would make much difference. For C, it normally doesn't. Are you thinking about doing that just to get better compiler warnings?
This would be to be able to use restricted pointers.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |