Re: [Bug-gnubg] Alternative weights files

[Thomas A. Moulton]

If you want to run gnubg vs gnubg (old vs new) we could run a test via FIBS.

It would be a lot slower than machine to machine...

On 09/18/2012 06:54 AM, Joseph Heled wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just in case you are unaware of it, my code does not reflect gnubg
> playing ability per-se, since it uses its own cube decision code.
> Move selection is similar, but not identical either. Nobody ever
> really compared the two approaches.
>
> Also, just out of curiosity, why do you think 1M is statistically significant?
>
> -Joseph
>
> On 18 September 2012 18:51, Philippe Michel<address@hidden>  wrote:
>    
> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Joseph Heled wrote:
> >
> >      
> > > What did you use to play those 1M games?
> > >        
> >
> > This was with your gnubg-nn/scripts/play/matchplay.py script.
> >      
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>
>