Re: [Bug-gnubg] question on engine abstraction

[Øystein Johansen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jon Kinsey wrote:
| Jon Nall wrote:
|
|> hello.
|> how well is the gnubg engine abstracted from the UI? specifically, i'm
|> curious how much work would be involved to write a new UI that uses
|> the gnubg engine (i'm thinking of a native OSX client). is there an
|> API anywhere?
|>
|> thanks for any help and/or pointers to documentation.
|> nall.
|
|
| I was looking at this the other day - it's not very well separated. Give
| me a few days and I'll see how easy it is to separate it.  I'll have a
| look at some of the globals too.

I'm able to compile the evaluation routines as a dll here on my windows
system. Would that be about the same thing as you would want?

I can mail you my Makefile and config and patches if you want?

- -Øystein

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBTbnR6kDTFPhwyqYRAmArAJ9OH4a7LCxxy1y2POy1BmDbPonfsgCfQx5c
hcSZs56MyKuFLUO2og4uMGU=
=Ds14
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----