[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnubg] Analysis result
From: |
Peter Steinleitner |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnubg] Analysis result |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:50:00 +0100 |
Player Y has a better Cubeplay Statistics/decision (supernatural) and a
better Checkerplay Statistics/move than Player X, both have 20 Unforced
moves and 28 Total moves. But in the Overall Statistics Player X has a lower
error rate/decision. How is this possible?
X Y
Chequer Play Statistics:
Total moves 28 28
Unforced moves 20 20
Unmarked moves 0 0
Moves marked good 24 24
Moves marked doubtful 2 2
Moves marked bad 1 1
Moves marked very bad 1 1
Error rate (total) -0.509 (-12.523%) -0.412 (-10.466%)
Error rate (per move) -25 ( -0.626%) -21 ( -0.523%)
Chequerplay rating Casual player Casual player
Luck Statistics:
Rolls marked very lucky 1 1
Rolls marked lucky 1 1
Rolls unmarked 23 25
Rolls marked unlucky 2 1
Rolls marked very unlucky 1 0
Luck rate (total) -1.370 (-33.557%) +0.761 ( +9.571%)
Luck rate (per move) -49 ( -1.198%) +27 ( +0.342%)
Luck rating Better luck next tim Good dice, man!
Cube Statistics:
Total cube decisions 28 5
Close or actual cube decisions 12 1
Doubles 0 1
Takes 1 0
Passes 0 0
Missed doubles (below CP) 1 (-0.066 ( -1.680 0
Missed doubles (above CP) 0 0
Wrong doubles (below DP) 0 0
Wrong doubles (above TG) 0 0
Wrong takes 0 0
Wrong passes 0 0
Error rate (total) -0.066 ( -1.680%) +0.000
Error rate (per cube decision) -5 ( -0.140%) -0
Cube decision rating Expert Supernatural
Overall Statistics:
Error rate (total) -0.575 (-14.203%) -0.412 (-10.466%)
Error rate (per decision) -18 ( -0.444%) -20 ( -0.498%)
Equiv. Snowie error rate -10 -7
Overall rating Intermediate Casual player
Actual result -50.00% +50.00%
Luck adjusted result -6.87% +6.87%
Luck based FIBS rating diff. -138.72
Error based abs. FIBS rating 1605.6 1693.7
Chequerplay errors rating loss 440.6 356.3
Cube errors rating loss 3.8 0.0
- [Bug-gnubg] Analysis result,
Peter Steinleitner <=