I analysed a match my nephew had played on FIBS with GNUBG 0.14 (build
Jul 2 2003), analysis setting was supremo for checkerplay.
In the situation shown below GNUBG critised Spock's move as a huge blunder, but I can't see why; to the contrary, isn't GNUBG's evaluation extremely faulty ?
Thanks for any explanations !
melBOT (O, 1 pts) vs. Spock (X, 0 pts) (Match to 5)
Game number 2
Move number 72: X to play 33
GNU Backgammon Position ID: FgAAwJ8dRAACAA
Match ID : QYmtABAAAAAA
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+ O: melBOT (Cube: 2)
| X | | O O X | OOO 1 point
| | | O | OOO
| | | | OO
| | | | OO
| | | | OO
v| |BAR| | 5 point match
| | | 7 |
| | | X |
| | | X X |
| | | X X X | Rolled 33
| X | | X X X | 0 points
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+ X: Spock
Pip counts: O 7, X 98
* Spock moves 14/5 11/8
Alert: very bad move (-9,664%)
Output generated Fri Jul 18 18:01:33 2003
by GNU Backgammon 0.14-devel (Text Export version 1.39)
I didnt manage to copy the position directly from GNUBG into Wordpad
so that the position is shown right formatted, so I`ll post the appropriate
html-file and the pos-file as attachments, sorry for any inconvenience.