Re: [Bug-gnubg] (no subject)

[Jim Segrave]

On Wed 16 Jul 2003 (15:41 +0200), olivier croisille wrote:
> My mistake : I'm fine with 4 digits for roll out, which has been like this 
> for a long time anyway, as you correctly stated.
> 
> What I was referring to was the 'Cube decision' tab of the 'Annotation' 
> window :
> 
> Cube analysis
> 2-ply cubeless equity -0,0277 (Money: -0,0267)
>    49,12%  12,88%   0,35% -  50,88%  13,59%   0,54%
> Cubeful equities:
> 1. No double           -0,0361
> 2. Double, pass        +1,0000  (+1,0361)
> 3. Double, take        -0,4209  (-0,3848)
> Proper cube action: No double, take (27,1%)
> 
> Here I find this 4th digit very confusing for an immediate "grasp" of the 
> value of the position : I'm so used to reasoning with 3 decimal places that 
> in the example above, I could easily confuse the cubeless equity for 0.277 
> if I don't pay attention.

Ah - this I hadn't seen (or had not noticed). I personally don't mind
the %n.4 format, but wouldn't be bothered by a %n.3

-- 
Jim Segrave           address@hidden