Re: [Bug-gnubg] New fuctionallity for batch operations, opinions wanted!

[Joseph Heled]

Joern Thyssen wrote:

> Very fun and simple!
>
> Of course, I just need to add interfaces to the remaining 200 internal
> gnubg functions.
>
> Joseph, is this something that could be useful for you?
>
> Jørn

That was quick indeed!

I do all my development work using python wrappers over my version of 
GNUbg, which is just the core functionality from the 0.0 days.

But it will help me and everyone else to have this clean interface. Can 
we remove scheme with a compilation flag?

-Joseph