[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels
From: |
Morten Wang |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:25:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
* Joern Thyssen
> Yes, uncheck cubeful rollout and uncheck cubeful chequerplay. Turn off
> the Jacoby rule.
thanks to both of you!
I figured both those checkboxes for cube usage would have to be
unchecked, but I'd forgotten the Jacoby rule.
I did the 21600 0ply rollout for reference, and here's what I got:
Cube analysis
Rollout cubeless equity +0,516
1. Double, take +0,619
2. Double, pass +1,000 ( +0,381)
3. No double +0,335 ( -0,284)
Proper cube action: Double, take
Rollout details:
Centered 1-cube:
0,758 0,069 0,000 - 0,242 0,068 0,000 CL +0,504 CF +0,335
[0,050 0,024 0,028 - 0,050 0,012 0,000 CL 0,113 CF +0,138]
Player O owns 2-cube:
0,755 0,069 0,000 - 0,245 0,068 0,000 CL +0,998 CF +0,619
[0,049 0,024 0,028 - 0,049 0,012 0,000 CL 0,223 CF +0,282]
Full cubeful rollout with var.redn., with rotate rolls
21600 games, seed 11 using Mersenne Twister
Play and cube: 0-ply cubeless
I did forget to write down the exact percentage values the rollout
gave, but this particular rollout doesn't take too long, so I can
always rerun it tomorrow if need be (the machine I'd do it on is
currently 3072 games into the 2ply rollout and I won't disturb it).
Morten!
--
"...a liquid which was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea."
My opinions are not necessarily those of my provider,
not necessarily mine, and probably not necessary.
- [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Douglas Zare, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Joseph Heled, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Morten Wang, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Morten Wang, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Morten Wang, 2002/10/23
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Albert Silver, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels,
Morten Wang <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Joseph Heled, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Morten Wang, 2002/10/24
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Douglas Zare, 2002/10/24
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Douglas Zare, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Joseph Heled, 2002/10/23
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels, Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/24
- variance reduction [Was Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels], Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/24
- Re: variance reduction [Was Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels], nis, 2002/10/28
- Re: variance reduction [Was Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels], Joern Thyssen, 2002/10/28
- Re: variance reduction [Was Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels], nis, 2002/10/29