Re: gperf output licence

[Bruno Haible]

Paul Jarc wrote:
> >    On the other hand, the output produced by gperf contains essentially
> >    all of the input file.  Therefore the output is under the same license, 
> > with
> >    the same copyright holder, as the input that was passed to gperf.
> 
> I don't think that's necessarily true.  The output is a derivative
> work of the input, but whether it inherits the license depends on what
> license the input has, doesn't it?

Can you point out a software license (a realistic one, not a made-up one)
where the gperf-processed output would not be under the same license as the
input?

Bruno