[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430 binutils bug.
From: |
Takahashi, Chris |
Subject: |
RE: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430 binutils bug. |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jul 2003 08:52:05 -0700 |
Version 2.14 (MD5(binutils-2.14.tar.gz)= ba665d0ddcc88313384b79e293ecbbab)
_has_ the fix but it applies the fix only to some MSP430 architectures and
not all. I think I put the files in the wrong order. + marks which have
been removed and - marks new lines. I apologize for not following
conventions. Attached is a new diff file with - marking old lines and +
marking new.
I also downloaded the weekly snapshot of binutils (last updated Tuesday,
July 29 2003) and the tc-msp430.c files were the same as the file in 2.14
except the following was added around line 186.
@@ -186,6 +186,8 @@
" msp430x1101 msp430x1111\n"
" msp430x1121 msp430x1122 msp430x1132\n"
" msp430x122 msp430x123\n"
+ " msp430x1222 msp430x1232\n"
+ " msp430x133 msp430x135\n"
" msp430x1331 msp430x1351\n"
" msp430x147 msp430x148 msp430x149\n"
" msp430x155 msp430x156 msp430x157\n"
I apologize for any confusion this may have caused.
-Chris Takahashi
DIFF:
> cat binutils-msp430.diff
--- binutils-2.14/gas/config/tc-msp430.c.old 2003-07-30
16:35:44.000000000 -0700
+++ binutils-2.14/gas/config/tc-msp430.c 2003-07-30
16:49:21.000000000 -0700
@@ -979,11 +979,7 @@
else if (x == 4)
{
#ifdef PUSH_1X_WORKAROUND
- if (bin == 0x1200
- && (msp430_mcu->isa == MSP430_ISA_11
- || msp430_mcu->isa == MSP430_ISA_12
- || msp430_mcu->isa == MSP430_ISA_13
- || msp430_mcu->isa == MSP430_ISA_14))
+ if (bin == 0x1200)
{
/* Remove warning as confusing.
as_warn(_("Hardware push bug workaround")); */
@@ -1000,11 +996,7 @@
else if (x == 8)
{
#ifdef PUSH_1X_WORKAROUND
- if (bin == 0x1200
- && (msp430_mcu->isa == MSP430_ISA_11
- || msp430_mcu->isa == MSP430_ISA_12
- || msp430_mcu->isa == MSP430_ISA_13
- || msp430_mcu->isa == MSP430_ISA_14))
+ if (bin == 0x1200)
{
/* Remove warning as confusing.
as_warn(_("Hardware push bug workaround")); */
-----Original Message-----
From: Dmitry [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 2:13 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430 binutils bug.
looks like you're missing something --
2.14 has this bug workaround.
~d
On Thursday 31 July 2003 04:06, Takahashi, Chris wrote:
> The work around for the constant generator bug in the link below was still
> generating incorrect code. The problem was that the bug was present in
all
> versions of the msp430 but the work around was only applied to some
> versions.
>
> Attached is a diff -u of a fixed version of
> binutils-2.14/gas/config/tc-msp430.c with the original.
>
> Also attached is some simple code that will generate the faulty code in
the
> msp430x448 (and others). If you look at an asm listing you will see a
push
> #4 which generates the opcode 62 12 which is buggy (so is 72 12).
>
> Bug:
> http://www.ti.com/cgi-bin/sc/buglist.cgi?bug=CPU4
>
> -Chris Takahashi
--
/*****************************************************************
("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ (\ Dimmy the Wild UA1ACZ
`6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) State Polytechnical Univ.
(_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' Radio-Physics Departament
_..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' Saint Petersburg, Russia
(il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' +7 (812) 5403923, 5585314
*****************************************************************/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
binutils-msp430.diff
Description: Binary data
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- RE: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430 binutils bug.,
Takahashi, Chris <=