[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EPIPE in standard utils ([issue41])
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: EPIPE in standard utils ([issue41]) |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:33:14 -0800 (PST) |
It doesn't, but (as you mentioned later) most likely the parent
process ignored SIGPIPE and sed inherited that. In that case
the sed behavior is expected. However, normally SIGPIPE is not
ignored, so a typical program will die instantly with no
opportunity to write a message to stderr.
Ok, sure enough -- I had a brain bug about the timing of signal
delivery -- the source of these errors seems to be a shell bug.
Thanks.
-t