bug#53749: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Xref backend for TeX buffers

[Arash Esbati]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/tex-mode.el b/lisp/textmodes/tex-mode.el
>> index 97c950267c6..d990a2dbfa9 100644
>> --- a/lisp/textmodes/tex-mode.el
>> +++ b/lisp/textmodes/tex-mode.el
>> @@ -695,7 +696,25 @@ tex-verbatim-environments
>>       ("\\\\\\(?:end\\|begin\\) *\\({[^\n{}]*}\\)"
>>        (1 (ignore
>>            (tex-env-mark (match-beginning 0)
>> -                        (match-beginning 1) (match-end 1))))))))
>> +                        (match-beginning 1) (match-end 1)))))
>> +     ;; The next two rules change the syntax of `:' and `_' in expl3
>> +     ;; constructs, so that `tex-font-lock-suscript' can fontify them
>> +     ;; more accurately.
>> +     ((concat "\\(\\(?:[\\\\[:space:]{]_\\|"
>> +              
>> "[\\\\{[:space:]][^][_[:space:][:cntrl:][:digit:]\\\\{}()/=]+\\)"
>> +              
>> "\\(?:_+\\(?:[^][[:space:][:cntrl:][:digit:]:\\\\{}()/#_=]+\\|"
>> +              "#+[1-9]\\)\\)+\\)\\([:_]?\\)")
>
> Can you add in the comment some URL pointing to some relevant expl3
> documentation which "explains" why the above regexp makes sense?
> Also I don't clearly see how the above regexp distinguishes expl3 code
> from "normal" LaTeX code, so the comment should say something about
> it.

FWIW, I'm not sure if there is an URL for that, but in interface3.pdf,
chap.1, you'll find:

    1.1 Naming functions and variables

    LATEX3 does not use @ as a "letter"" for defining internal macros.
    Instead, the symbols _ and : are used in internal macro names to provide
    structure. The name of each function is divided into logical units using
    _, while : separates the name of the function from the argument
    specifier ("arg-spec"). This describes the arguments expected by the
    function. In most cases, each argument is represented by a single
    letter. The complete list of arg-spec letters for a function is referred
    to as the signature of the function.

So expect things like this:

    \tl_set:Nn \l_mya_tl { A }
    \tl_set:Nn \l_myb_tl { B }
    \tl_set:Nf \l_mya_tl { \l_mya_tl \l_myb_tl }

>> +;; Setup AUCTeX modes (for testing purposes only).
>> +
>> +(add-hook 'TeX-mode-hook #'tex-set-auctex-xref-backend)
>> +
>> +(defun tex-set-auctex-xref-backend ()
>> +  (add-hook 'xref-backend-functions #'tex--xref-backend nil t))
>
> I assume this will be sent to AUCTeX and is not meant to be in
> `tex-mode.el`, right?

That would have been a question from my side, but I saw that "testing
purposes only" and skipped it for this round.

Best, Arash