|
From: | No Wayman |
Subject: | bug#70686: 30.0.50; cl--position is slow |
Date: | Wed, 01 May 2024 08:20:56 -0400 |
User-agent: | mu4e 1.12.4; emacs 30.0.50 |
Not sure why is this a bug report.
Slow performance, especially in a widely used library like cl-lib, is a bug.
Where would you prefer such observations be reported?
If cl-position is too slow for your application, you can always use something else, something that is less generic and more tailored to your specific sequence type(s), no?
As stated, I've done that and am aware of the general performance/flexibility trade-offs. It would be preferable to improve the performance of that function, as it would benefit anyone using it.
Are you confident the performance trade-off is due to dispatching on sequence types in this case? Do you think the performance could be improved without sacrificing that flexibility? I'll dig into it more when I have time, but I'm starting a discussion here in case someone has already made an attempt or knows the answers to those questions.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |