[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#70609: 30.0.50; [PATCH] New function 'python-shell-send-block' for p
From: |
Lin Sun |
Subject: |
bug#70609: 30.0.50; [PATCH] New function 'python-shell-send-block' for python-mode |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:51:18 +0000 |
Hi Kobarity,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 7:28 AM kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> > > From: Lin Sun <sunlin7.mail@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 14:14:06 +0000
> > >
> > > Here is a function 'python-shell-send-block' to send a block to the
> > > python interpreter in python mode, it's similar to
> > > `python-shell-send-defun` but works on block.
> > >
> > > The implementation and testing are included in that patch.
> > >
> > > Please help review the changes.
> > >
> > > [PATCH] New function 'python-shell-send-block' for python-mode
> > >
> > > * lisp/progmodes/python.el: Add implemention of the function.
> > > * test/lisp/progmodes/python-tests.el: Test case for the function.
> > > * etc/NEWS: Document for the function.
> >
> > kobarity, any comments?
>
> I think `python-shell-send-block' itself is good, but there may be
> room for improvement in the test case.
>
> It is better not to use f-strings as much as possible because it
> depends on the Python version.
>
> `python-tests-look-at' is basically for moving point. Since it looks
> for the next occurrence of the specified string, it may move the point
> to an unexpected location. For testing, it would be better to use
> `looking-at', etc. or compare the point after moving with
> `python-tests-look-at' to the expected value.
Thanks for the comments and you're right, so I attach the changes to
avoid the python f-string, also using the `looking-at` to do exactly
matching.
Please help review the enhanced testing code. Thanks.
0001-New-function-python-shell-send-block-for-python-mode.patch
Description: Text Data