[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2019 10:21:32 +0300 |
> From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 34765@debbugs.gnu.org, alexanderm@web.de,
> monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 08:58:17 +0100
>
> The possibilities for the buffer creation subroutine are either to act
> specially on certain buffer name prefixes, or to accept an extra
> argument indicating what to do, no? Are there any others? There was
> mention of exposing a buffer-local variable to Elisp, but IIRC setting
> that after creating the buffer would already be too late.
>
> Buffer names starting with spaces are already special in some contexts,
> so extending that idea for inhibiting buffer hooks doesn't sound too
> bad, but the extra flag seems equally elegant and more
> backward-compatible. Am I missing something?
The flag in the C structure has the advantage that it can be easily
set and reset from C without the need to temporarily bind Lisp
variables, which then involves unwind-protect forms etc., and as a
side effect makes the entire operation slower. Also, a flag can be
set/reset regardless of whether the buffer already finished being
created, whereas buffer-local variables must have a live buffer.
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, (continued)
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2019/05/21
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, martin rudalics, 2019/05/21
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/22
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, martin rudalics, 2019/05/22
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/22
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, martin rudalics, 2019/05/23
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/23
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, martin rudalics, 2019/05/24
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/22
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/22
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook,
Eli Zaretskii <=