[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 22:18:56 +0200 |
> From: Alex <agrambot@gmail.com>
> Cc: alex.branham@gmail.com, 34858@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 12:57:08 -0600
>
> Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant that the special case here could be
> considered (trivially) equivalent to the case where the previous
> non-blank line has a single indent point at column zero, and therefore
> should be treated equivalently when FIRST-ONLY is non-nil
> (`tab-to-tab-stop` should not be called if on or past the first indent
> point, i.e., column 0).
But then we'd do nothing in that situation. How does it make sense?
> The usage of `beyond' does not change the behaviour when the starting
> column is on the first indent point, which outside of this special case
> is doing nothing.
When there are previous lines to align with, yes. But here there's
nothing before, so what is the justification for doing nothing?
- bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop, (continued)
- bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/03/14
- bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop, Alex Branham, 2019/03/14
- bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop, Filipp Gunbin, 2019/03/20
- bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop, Alex Branham, 2019/03/25
- bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/03/26
- bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop, Alex Branham, 2019/03/26
- bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/03/26
bug#34858: indent-relative called with prefix calls tab-to-tab-stop, Alex, 2019/03/14