bug#34852: 26.1; seq-intersection ignores nil as element

[Michael Heerdegen]

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:

> My first patch makes an analogous backward-compatible change using the
> more efficient seq-position in place of seq-some.

Why is it more efficient?  The implementations are more or less
analogue, with the exception that seq-position additionally increments a
counter.


Michael.