[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Oct 2018 05:32:35 +0300 |
> From: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:39:53 +0100
> Cc: 32986@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Thank you for the clarification. I have now read the original explanation,
> and it makes sense. Ultimately, I think
> the sit-for is the right approach for my wait-for-any-process-or-input
> problem. Am I right to assume it's not
> affected by your explanation, and that I can expect immediate return there?
sit-for waits for keyboard input, so yes, it should return once the
user presses some key.
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/09
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/09
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/14
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/15
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/15