[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers
From: |
Helmut Eller |
Subject: |
bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 06:49:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon, Jul 23 2018, Paul Eggert wrote:
> %a has quite a different meaning in C11, so we'd need to use some
With your change %x will also have quite a different meaning in C11.
> other letter (or set of letters, if we want something for %x, %X, %o)
> if we went that route. This seems like overkill for such a small
> change to functionality that hardly ever matters; plus, %x, %X and %o
> would continue to have problematic machine-dependent semantics and
> would not be sensibly extensible to bignums.
If it doesn't matter to you then why make the change/break at all? You
could just create a function bignum-to-hex-string.
Helmut
bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/23
bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers,
Helmut Eller <=
- bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/24
- bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Andreas Schwab, 2018/07/24
- bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Helmut Eller, 2018/07/24
- bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/24
- bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/25
- bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/25
- bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/25
- bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/26
- bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Helmut Eller, 2018/07/26
- bug#32252: [PATCH] %o and %x now format signed numbers, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/26