bug#18059: 24.3.92; defvar and special variables

[Drew Adams]

> Also, to clarify, I meant specifically non-toplevel (defvar foo), not
> (defvar foo <value>).

Too bad I didn't get your reply until after I spent time
digging out the latter, not the former.

I have FAR MORE examples of the former (vacuous defvars)
if you really need them.

Frankly, I find it hard to believe that someone would
doubt that there would be a use for non top-level
defvars.