[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:22:55 +0200 |
> Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:16:47 +0200
>
> On 2/20/18 8:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > I'd need someone (Chris?) to tell which situations cause (t SOMETHING)
> > be put into unread-command-events. If these situations are rare
> > enough, maybe we can risk it.
>
> At least one of the places that do that is sit-for. See the long comment
> at the end of its definition (I don't really understand its last
> sentence, FWIW).
But then how come you have (t t . 45) there?
- bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled, Dmitry Gutov, 2018/02/20
- bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/02/20
- bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled, Dmitry Gutov, 2018/02/20
- bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled, Chris Feng, 2018/02/21
- bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled, Dmitry Gutov, 2018/02/21
- bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled, Dmitry Gutov, 2018/02/21
- bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/02/21
- bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled, Dmitry Gutov, 2018/02/21
- bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/02/22