[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:12:48 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 09:30:41 +0100 Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> wrote:
RP> emacs-26 builds for me now. BTW Ted, did you want to put the DUMBFW
RP> compatibility inside the HAVE_GNUTLS3 conditional?
RP> HAVE_GNUTLS_EXT__DUMBFW implies HAVE_GNUTLS3, but it's currently used
RP> on its own.
It's pinned to a version over 3 so I think that's OK. Makes no
difference either way, so if someone wants to move it, feel free.
Ted
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, (continued)
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Kaushal Modi, 2017/12/20
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Andy Moreton, 2017/12/20
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Andy Moreton, 2017/12/20
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Andy Moreton, 2017/12/20
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/12/20
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/12/20
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/21
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/21
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Andy Moreton, 2017/12/21
- bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/21