[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:43:53 +0200 |
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: 29785@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org
> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:50:34 +0100
>
> >> So do I, but I don't want to elicit any 'how dare you change
> >> behaviour' comments a year from now.
> >
> > The behavior doesn't change, though.
>
> As currently proposed, no. But if I enabled the separate history
> unconditionally then it would.
No, it won't. M-p and M-n would still work as they did before.
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20
- bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Robert Pluim, 2017/12/21
bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/12/20