bug#28605: 26.0.60; Part of leftmost character hidden

[Robert Pluim]

martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> writes:

>> Thinking about this some more, this whole calculation just looks
>> wrong. oldx, oldw, oldw and oldh are in unscaled pixels, as far as I
>> can tell. We need to scale when using GTK routines, but x_clear_area
>> ends up calling X11 routines, so I've almost convinced myself that we
>> should in fact delete the oldw and oldx adjustments for the vertical
>> scrollbar rather than adding them for the horizontal one.
>
> Be sure to distinguish code that decides where to draw a scroll bar from
> code that decides which area to clear and possibly redraw.  Sometimes,
> the area that gets cleared can be substantially larger than the area
> occupied by a toolkit scroll bar.  From my experience, this is often
> noticeable with GTK scroll bars since their width is determined by the
> chosen theme and cannot be adjusted individually by Emacs.

OK. The best course of action is then probably not to touch the
existing adjustments, and not to add any similar ones for the
horizontal case.

>> That code was added in commit c0055ff5b03c9121ab5bf752496b09416f0f0a7d
>> which is quite old,
>
> ... 2015 rather strikes me as "fairly recent" ...
>

Oops, I think I looked at the date on the wrong commit, I thought I'd
seen 2010.

>> I suspect it did no real harm even though oldx
>> tends to end up negative, possibly x_clear_area does some kind of
>> clipping.
>
> In my experience, X silently swallows anything that happens outside the
> frame.  GTK can be much more picky in this regard, especially when
> trying to draw something outside a parent widget.  But the corresponding
> error messages are usually a pain to read.

Yet another reason not to disturb the status quo.

Regards

Robert