bug#27674: 26.0.50; cl-progv: strange scoping due to implementation

[Michael Heerdegen]

npostavs@users.sourceforge.net writes:

> Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
>
> > The way `cl-progv' is implemented, we have some strange effects
> > happening to closures in the body.  For example, with lexical-binding
> > on,
> >
> > (let ((x 0))
> >   (cl-progv (list 'x) (list 1)
> >     (funcall (lambda () x))))
> >
> > yields 0, and
> >
> > (cl-progv (list 'x) (list 1)
> >   (funcall (lambda () x)))
> >
> > yields 1.  That isn't consistent (FWIW I would expect `1' in both
> > cases).
>
> IMO, this is a bug in your program

Why?

>, this yields 1:
>
> (progn
>   (defvar x)
>   (let ((x 0))
>     (cl-progv (list 'x) (list 1)
>       (funcall (lambda () x)))))

Sure, but that's something different.  I didn't want a special variable
in my example.  The doc of `cl-progv' doesn't mention that the symbols
must correspond to special variables.  Do I miss something?


Michael.