bug#27397: [PATCH] New commands for bulk tracing of elisp functions

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 6/17/17 12:20 PM, Phil Sainty wrote:

> Actually popping up that buffer when
> the `trace-package' or `trace-regexp' command is used would be another
> (perhaps nicer) option?

Perhaps.

> Do others think that foreground versions of these commands would be
> a good idea?

I'm fine with having only the background versions, but others are 
welcome to weigh in.

> A prefix argument could mean "use foreground tracing"

Nah, if we do want foreground tracing, adding separate commands 
shouldn't be a problem.