[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?
From: |
npostavs |
Subject: |
bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing? |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:58:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
severity 14967 wishlist
quit
Alex <agrambot@gmail.com> writes:
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
>>> Well, obviously I consider this behavior a bug. Trash is no place for
>>> deleted packages. I mean, does apt-get remove use the Trash?!
>>
>> I think the reasoning goes as follows:
>> Emacs uses "trash" when deleting a file upon the user's request (as
>> opposed to things like temp files used internally).
>
> Could there perhaps be a separate configuration option for deleting
> packages versus trashing them? I usually like Emacs using the trash, but
> I don't see a reason why packages should go there myself.
Seems reasonable.
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?,
npostavs <=
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?, Alex, 2017/06/11
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/12
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?, Glenn Morris, 2017/06/12
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/12
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?, Glenn Morris, 2017/06/12
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?, Stefan Monnier, 2017/06/12
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?, Richard Stallman, 2017/06/13
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/12
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?, Stefan Monnier, 2017/06/12
- bug#14967: 24.3.50; package-delete deletes by trashing?, Alex, 2017/06/12