|
| From: | Tino Calancha |
| Subject: | bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Dec 2016 23:01:55 +0900 (JST) |
| User-agent: | Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) |
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Philipp Stephani wrote:
Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com> schrieb am Sa., 10. Dez. 2016 um 08:45
Uhr:
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
Right, the order of evaluation in a let is up to the implementation. A
program
should not rely on such details.
The same statement should apply to cl-letf.
Sorry, i meant above the order of 'assign the bindings' is up to the implementation.
I think that should be mentioned explicitly in the manuals: given that the order of value evaluations is specified, people might expect the same for the bindings themselves.
Yes, it's worth to remark than in the manual.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |