[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Nov 2016 08:54:13 -0800 (PST) |
> > The (implicit) decision to diverge further from Common Lisp has
> > been made a while ago, by prefixing the CL functions with `cl' and
> > importing the `seq' and `map' libraries, which provide similar
> > functionality, but with a different interface.
>
> Maybe (though, I don't think there was such decision, implicit or
> not - "seq" and "map" functions also have an according prefix - I
> wouldn't say we are converging are diverging to/from Common Lisp
> at all, but give developers a stylistic choice). But here were
> are talking about a construct that exists in pure Elisp, and OTOH
> also in Common Lisp, sharing the same name. If there is not
> really a need to make the semantics differ, I prefer to leave
> things as they are, because everything else would probably be
> more confusing than helpful.
+1. Well put.
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning, (continued)
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning, npostavs, 2016/11/24
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning, Michael Albinus, 2016/11/24
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning, Michael Heerdegen, 2016/11/24
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning, Michael Heerdegen, 2016/11/24
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning, Drew Adams, 2016/11/25
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning, Michael Heerdegen, 2016/11/27
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning, Drew Adams, 2016/11/27
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning, Philipp Stephani, 2016/11/27
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning, Michael Heerdegen, 2016/11/28
- bug#25017: Fwd: Re: dotimes var comiler warning,
Drew Adams <=