[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24639: [PATCH] Send text received by bracketed paste to process
From: |
Philipp Stephani |
Subject: |
bug#24639: [PATCH] Send text received by bracketed paste to process |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:43:05 +0100 |
From: Philipp Stephani <phst@google.com>
Fixes #24639
* term.el (term--xterm-paste): New function.
(term-raw-map): Use it.
(xterm--pasted-text): Declare function from xterm.el.
---
lisp/term.el | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lisp/term.el b/lisp/term.el
index 993e580..18d6775 100644
--- a/lisp/term.el
+++ b/lisp/term.el
@@ -845,6 +845,7 @@ term-raw-map
(define-key map [S-insert] 'term-paste)
(define-key map [prior] 'term-send-prior)
(define-key map [next] 'term-send-next)
+ (define-key map [xterm-paste] #'term--xterm-paste)
map)
"Keyboard map for sending characters directly to the inferior process.")
@@ -1211,6 +1212,13 @@ term-paste
(interactive)
(term-send-raw-string (current-kill 0)))
+(defun term--xterm-paste ()
+ "Insert the text pasted in an XTerm bracketed paste operation."
+ (interactive)
+ (term-send-raw-string (xterm--pasted-text)))
+
+(declare-function xterm--pasted-text "term/xterm" ())
+
;; Which would be better: "\e[A" or "\eOA"? readline accepts either.
;; For my configuration it's definitely better \eOA but YMMV. -mm
;; For example: vi works with \eOA while elm wants \e[A ...
--
2.10.1