[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-mayb
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:23:22 +0300 |
> From: Alex <agrambot@gmail.com>
> Cc: 24766@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:43:57 -0600
>
> What about changing `indent-relative-maybe' and adding an extra argument
> to `indent-relative'? Since `indent-relative-maybe' has had that
> docstring for a good 15 years, and the name fits the new behaviour more.
>
> Then in Emacs core we can replace the single instance of it with
> (indent-relative t). The corresponding diff:
I'd prefer a backward-compatible change, i.e. make the new argument be
the 2nd one, and keep the current behavior when the 1st arg is non-nil
and the 2nd is nil or omitted.
Also, please add the necessary text to the doc string to document the
new argument.
Thanks.
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Alex, 2016/10/22
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/22
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Alex, 2016/10/22
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/22
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Alex, 2016/10/22
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/23
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Alex, 2016/10/23
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Alex, 2016/10/24
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/24