[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding dept
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size" |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Oct 2016 09:52:34 +0300 |
> From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
> Cc: 24358@debbugs.gnu.org, peder@klingenberg.no
> Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 16:55:17 -0400
>
> > r_alloc_sbrk? What OS is this? We only use ralloc.c on a handful of
> > them, as of Emacs 25.
>
> Uh, it's GNU/Linux (Arch), so not too obscure I would think.
I thought no GNU/Linux system uses ralloc.c, but maybe I was mistaken.
> Where is the decision to use ralloc made?
It was always a fallback, for systems that don't have better ways of
allocating system memory. MS-Windows was using it until 25.1.
> Maybe something went wrong in my configure?
I guess configure somehow decides that gmalloc.c should be used on
your system (as opposed to the system-provided malloc), and then
ralloc.c is a necessity. Look in your config.log for any test related
to malloc or something that has "malloc" as its substring.
In any case, this doesn't invalidate the bug, of course.
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", npostavs, 2016/10/07
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/08
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", npostavs, 2016/10/08
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/08
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/08
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", npostavs, 2016/10/08
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/08
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", npostavs, 2016/10/08
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/08
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", npostavs, 2016/10/08
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size",
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", npostavs, 2016/10/12
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/13
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", npostavs, 2016/10/13
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/14
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", npostavs, 2016/10/18
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/19
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", npostavs, 2016/10/19
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/19
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", npostavs, 2016/10/20
- bug#24358: 25.1.50; re-search-forward errors with "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/20