[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24195: 25.0.95; Wrong indentation after a 'less < than' comparison (
|
From: |
npostavs |
|
Subject: |
bug#24195: 25.0.95; Wrong indentation after a 'less < than' comparison (c++-mode) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:11:26 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> On Aug 12 2016, Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote:
>>> Yes. In the line "k() < l() &&", the "<" is being recognised as a
>>> template opener.
>>
>> Is it possible to say that "<" can't be a template opener when it
>> comes after a close paren? (I can't think of a case in C++ where that
>> would fail, though I'm not 100% certain there isn't one)
>
> operator()<foo>
So could we say "<" can't be a template opener when it comes after a
close paren except for the close paren of "operator()"?