[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string |
Date: |
Mon, 2 May 2016 13:58:38 -0700 (PDT) |
> >> Should the docstrings mention that some files and subdirectories do get
> >> ignored, according to vc-directory-exclusion-list and
> >> grep-find-ignored-files?
> >
> > I'm not Eli, but yes.
>
> Would you like to propose the wording?
Presumably something like this (?).
Files with names matching the values of `vc-directory-exclusion-list'
or `grep-find-ignored-files' are not searched.
> Should both dired-do-find-regexp and dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace's
> docstrings contain the same sentences for that information?
If the meaning/behavior is the same, why not?
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string, Drew Adams, 2016/05/02
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/05/02
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string, Drew Adams, 2016/05/02
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/02
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/05/02
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string, Drew Adams, 2016/05/02
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/05/02
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/05/02
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string, Drew Adams, 2016/05/02
- bug#23429: 25.0.90; `dired-do-find-regexp' doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/03